|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH2BrF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bromine |
|
|
|
Nuclear
Quadrupole Coupling Constants |
|
|
|
in Bromofluoromethane |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of the bromine nqcc's in bromofluoromethane was made on best estimate re structures derived ab initio by Cazzoli et al. [1], and by Puzzarini et al. [2].
Calculated and experimental [3] nqcc's are compared in Tables 1 - 6. Structure
parameters are given in Table 7. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Tables 1 - 8, subscripts
a,b,c refer to the principal axes of the inertia tensor; subscripts x,y,z to the principal axes of the nqcc tensor.
The nqcc y-axis is chosen coincident with the c-axis. Ø
(degrees) is the angle between its subscripted parameters. ETA = (Xxx - Xyy)/Xzz. |
|
|
RMS is the root
mean square
difference between calculated and experimental diagonal nqcc
(percentage of average of absolute experimental nqcc's).
RSD
is the residual standard deviation of calibration of the
B1LYP/TZV(3df,3p) model for calculation of the nqcc's, which may be
taken as estimate of the uncertainty in the calculated nqcc's. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 1. 79Br nqcc's
in CH2BrF (MHz). Calculation was made on the re structure of Cazzoli et al. [1], and on the re structure of Puzzarini et al. [2]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calc. [1]
|
|
Calc. [2] |
|
Expt. [3] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xaa |
|
444.32 |
|
443.17 |
|
443.431(8) |
|
|
Xbb - Xcc |
|
151.62 |
|
151.67 |
|
153.566(26) |
|
|
Xbb |
- |
146.35 |
- |
145.75 |
- |
144.932 * |
|
|
Xcc |
- |
297.97 |
- |
297.42 |
- |
298.499 * |
|
|
|Xab| |
|
276.67 |
|
276.39 |
|
278.56(19) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMS |
|
1.01 (0.34 %) |
|
0.80 (0.27 %) |
|
|
|
|
RSD |
|
1.58 (0.39 %) |
|
1.58 (0.39 %) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xxx |
- |
255.70 |
- |
255.14 |
- |
255.891 |
|
|
Xyy |
- |
297.97 |
- |
297.42 |
- |
298.499 |
|
|
Xzz |
|
553.67 |
|
552.56 |
|
554.389 |
|
|
ETA |
|
0.0763 |
|
0.0765 |
|
|
|
|
Øz,a |
|
21.56 |
|
21.59 |
|
|
|
|
Øa,CBr |
|
21.13 |
|
21.13 |
|
|
|
|
Øz,CBr |
|
0.44 |
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Derived here from the experimental Xaa and Xbb - Xcc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2. 81Br nqcc's
in CH2BrF (MHz). Calculation was made on the re structure of Cazzoli et al. [1], and on the re structure of Puzzarini et al. [2]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calc. [1]
|
|
Calc. [2] |
|
Expt. [3] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xaa |
|
371.43 |
|
370.47 |
|
370.6497(59) |
|
|
Xbb - Xcc |
|
126.46 |
|
126.50 |
|
127.966(22) |
|
|
Xbb |
- |
122.48 |
- |
121.99 |
- |
121.342 * |
|
|
Xcc |
- |
248.94 |
- |
248.49 |
- |
249.308 * |
|
|
|Xab| |
|
230.92 |
|
230.68 |
|
232.657(46) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMS |
|
0.82 (0.33 %) |
|
0.61 (0.25 %) |
|
|
|
|
RSD |
|
1.38 (0.40 %) |
|
1.38 (0.40 %) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xxx |
- |
213.63 |
- |
213.16 |
- |
213.936 |
|
|
Xyy |
- |
248.94 |
- |
248.49 |
- |
249.308 |
|
|
Xzz |
|
462.58 |
|
461.65 |
|
463.244 |
|
|
ETA |
|
0.0763 |
|
0.0765 |
|
|
|
|
Øz,a |
|
21.54 |
|
21.57 |
|
|
|
|
Øa,CBr |
|
21.10 |
|
21.11 |
|
|
|
|
Øz,CBr |
|
0.44 |
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Derived here from the experimental Xaa and Xbb - Xcc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 3. 79Br nqcc's
in CDHBrF (MHz). Calculation was made on the re structure of Cazzoli et al. [1], and on the re structure of Puzzarini et al. [2]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calc. [1]
|
|
Calc. [2] |
|
Expt. [3] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xaa |
|
451.19 |
|
450.03 |
|
450.310(11) |
|
|
Xbb - Xcc |
|
140.24 |
|
140.29 |
|
141.818(28) |
|
|
Xbb |
- |
155.48 |
- |
154.87 |
- |
154.246 * |
|
|
Xcc |
- |
295.71 |
- |
295.16 |
- |
296.064 * |
|
|
|Xab| ** |
|
266.79 |
|
266.53 |
|
269.77(33) |
|
|
|Xac| |
|
35.60 |
|
35.58 |
|
28.7(33) |
|
|
|Xbc| |
|
17.86 |
|
17.88 |
|
17.75(89) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMS |
|
0.90 (0.30 %) |
|
0.65 (0.22 %) |
|
|
|
|
RSD |
|
1.58 (0.39 %) |
|
1.58 (0.39 %) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Derived here from the experimental Xaa and Xbb - Xcc. |
|
|
** The product XaaXbbXcc is positive. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 4. 81Br nqcc's
in CDHBrF (MHz). Calculation was made on the re structure of Cazzoli et al. [1], and on the re structure of Puzzarini et al. [2]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calc. [1]
|
|
Calc. [2] |
|
Expt. [3] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xaa |
|
377.18 |
|
376.21 |
|
376.383(11) |
|
|
Xbb - Xcc |
|
116.94 |
|
116.99 |
|
118.282(22) |
|
|
Xbb |
- |
130.12 |
- |
129.61 |
- |
129.050 * |
|
|
Xcc |
- |
247.06 |
- |
246.60 |
- |
247.333 * |
|
|
|Xab| ** |
|
222.65 |
|
222.43 |
|
223.65(36) |
|
|
|Xac| |
|
29.73 |
|
29.71 |
|
33.5(22) |
|
|
|Xbc| |
|
14.90 |
|
14.91 |
|
14.69(91) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMS |
|
0.79 (0.31 %) |
|
0.54 (0.22 %) |
|
|
|
|
RSD |
|
1.38 (0.40 %) |
|
1.38 (0.40 %) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Derived here from the experimental Xaa and Xbb - Xcc. |
|
|
** The product XaaXbbXcc is positive. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 5. 79Br nqcc's
in CD2BrF (MHz). Calculation was made on the re structure of Cazzoli et al. [1], and on the re structure of Puzzarini et al. [2]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calc. [1]
|
|
Calc. [2] |
|
Expt. [2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xaa |
|
457.77 |
|
456.61 |
|
456.7559(51) |
|
|
Xbb - Xcc |
|
138.17 |
|
138.24 |
|
139.12(14) |
|
|
Xbb |
- |
159.80 |
- |
159.18 |
|
158.82 * |
|
|
Xcc |
- |
297.97 |
- |
297.42 |
|
297.94 * |
|
|
|Xab| |
|
261.58 |
|
261.34 |
|
262.76(18) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMS |
|
0.81 (0.27 %) |
|
0.37 (0.12 %) |
|
|
|
|
RSD |
|
1.58 (0.39 %) |
|
1.58 (0.39 %) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Derived here from the experimental Xaa and Xbb - Xcc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 6. 81Br nqcc's
in CD2BrF (MHz). Calculation was made on the re structure of Cazzoli et al. [1], and on the re structure of Puzzarini et al. [2]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calc. [1]
|
|
Calc. [2] |
|
Expt. [3] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xaa |
|
382.68 |
|
381.71 |
|
381.8245(47) |
|
|
Xbb - Xcc |
|
115.21 |
|
115.26 |
|
116.296(44) |
|
|
Xbb |
- |
133.74 |
- |
133.22 |
- |
132.764 * |
|
|
Xcc |
- |
248.94 |
- |
248.49 |
- |
249.060 * |
|
|
|Xab| |
|
218.27 |
|
218.07 |
|
219.44(25) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMS |
|
0.75 (0.30 %) |
|
0.43 (0.17 %) |
|
|
|
|
RSD |
|
1.38 (0.40 %) |
|
1.38 (0.40 %) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Derived here from the experimental Xaa and Xbb - Xcc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 7. Bromofluoromethane. Structure
parameters, best estimate re [1,2] (Å and degrees). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
re [1] |
re [2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CF |
1.3592 |
1.3578 |
|
|
|
CBr |
1.9275 |
1.9256 |
|
|
|
CH |
1.0840 |
1.0833 |
|
|
|
FCBr |
110.17 |
110.14 |
|
|
|
HCF |
109.48 |
109.51 |
|
|
|
HCBr |
107.32 |
107.27 |
|
|
|
HCH |
113.03 |
113.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] G.Cazzoli, C.Puzzarini, A.Baldacci, and A.Baldan, J.Mol.Spectrosc. 241,115(2007).
|
|
|
[2] C.Puzzarini, G.Cazzoli, A.Baldacci, A.Baldan, C.Michauk, and J.Gauss, J.Chem.Phys. 127,164302(2007). |
|
|
[3] G.Cazzoli, C.Puzzarini, S.Stopkowicz, and J.Gauss, Mol.Phys. 106,1181(2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BrClCF2 |
CH3Cl |
CH3Br |
CF2Cl2 |
|
|
BrClCH2 |
CF3Cl |
CF3Br |
CH2Cl2 |
|
|
CH2FCl |
CHF2Cl |
CH2Br2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table of Contents |
|
|
|
|
|
Molecules/Bromine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBrFH2_2.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last Modified 16 Sept 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|