|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BrH2C-CH2OH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bromine |
|
|
|
Nuclear
Quadrupole Coupling Constants |
|
|
in 2-Bromoethanol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of the bromine nqcc's in 2-bromoethanol was made on structures derived ab initio
by the methods of the Lille group, as described below. These are
compared with the experimental nqcc's of Azrak and Wilson [1] in Tables 1 and 2.
Eigenvectors of the nqcc tensor are given in Table 3. Structure
parameters are given in Table 4. Atomic
coordinates and rotational constants are given in Tables 5 and 6,
respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Tables 1 and 2, subscripts a,b,c refer to the
principal axes of the inertia tensor; x,y,z to the principal axes
of the nqcc tensor.
Ø (degrees) is the angle between its subscripted
parameters. ETA = (Xxx - Xyy)/Xzz. |
|
|
RMS is the root mean square
difference between calculated and experimental diagonal nqcc's
(percentage of the average of the magnitudes of the experimental
nqcc's). RSD is the calibration residual standard deviation of
the B1LYP/TZV(3df,3p) model for calculation of the bromine nqcc's. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 1. 79Br
nqcc's in 2-Bromoethanol (MHz). Calculation was made on ab initio
structures with C-O-H geometry and all interatomic angles given
by (1) MP2/6-311+G(d,p), and (2) MP2/6-311+G(2d,p)
optimization. See below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calc. (1)
|
|
Calc. (2) |
|
Expt. [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xaa |
|
245.83 |
|
244.37 |
|
240(5) |
|
Xbb |
|
11.08 |
|
11.98 |
|
15(5) |
|
Xcc |
- |
256.91 |
- |
256.35 |
- |
255(5) |
|
Xab * |
|
366.51 |
|
367.28 |
- |
370(20) |
|
|
Xac * |
- |
107.67 |
- |
106.36 |
|
~ 1/3 Xab |
|
|
Xbc * |
|
- 88.51 |
|
- 88.52 |
|
< |Xac| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMS |
|
4.2 (2.5 %) |
3.2 (1.9 %) |
|
|
|
RSD |
|
1.58 (0.39 %) |
1.58 (0.39 %) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xxx |
- |
254.09 |
- |
254.32 |
|
|
|
|
Xyy |
- |
283.58 |
- |
283.11 |
|
|
|
|
Xzz |
|
537.67 |
|
537.43 |
|
|
|
|
ETA |
|
0.054 |
|
0.054 |
|
|
|
|
Øz,CBr |
|
0.55 |
|
0.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Here and in Table 2, the algebraic signs of the
off-diagonal components depend on the orientation of the molecule
with respect to the positive/negative sense of the a,b,c axes. Here, the algebraic signs correspond
to the atomic a,b,c coordinates given in Table 4. In this regard,
calculated and experimental off-diagonal nqcc's can be brought into
agreement by transformation: b --> -b. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2. 81Br
nqcc's in 2-Bromoethanol (MHz). Calculation was made on ab initio
structures with C-O-H geometry and all interatomic angles given
by (1) MP2/6-311+G(d,p), and (2) MP2/6-311+G(2d,p)
optimization. See below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calc. (1)
|
|
Calc. (2) |
|
Expt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xaa |
|
206.08 |
|
204.86 |
|
190(10) |
|
|
Xbb |
|
8.62 |
|
9.36 |
|
17(10) |
|
|
Xcc |
- |
214.70 |
- |
214.23 |
- |
207(10) |
|
|
Xab * |
|
306.02 |
|
306.66 |
- |
305(20) |
|
|
Xac * |
|
- 89.91 |
|
- 88.81 |
|
~ 1/3 Xab |
|
|
Xbc * |
|
- 73.76 |
|
- 73.77 |
|
< |Xac| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMS |
|
11.4 (8.2 %) |
10.5 (7.6 %) |
|
|
|
RSD |
|
1.38 (0.40 %) |
1.38 (0.40 %) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 3. 2-Bromoethanol - 79Br. Eigenvectors (direction cosines) of the nqcc tensor. Ab initio structure with C-O-H geometry and all interatomic angles given by MP2/6-311+G(2d,p) optimization. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
y |
|
z |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a |
- |
0.6062 |
- |
0.0508 |
|
0.7937 |
|
|
|
|
b |
|
0.7353 |
|
0.3444 |
|
0.5837 |
|
|
|
|
c |
- |
0.3030 |
|
0.9374 |
- |
0.1714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Molecular Structure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ropt
structures were derived as follows: The molecular structure was
optimized at the MP2/6-311+G(d,p) level of theory. The optimized
CC single bond length was then corrected using the equation obtained
from linear regression analysis of the data given in Table IX of Ref.
[2]. CH bond lengths were corrected using r = 1.001
× ropt, where ropt is obtained by MP2/6-31G(d,p) optimization [3].
|
|
|
For the C-Br bond length, optimization was made at the MP2/6-311+G(2d,p) level of theory of the C-Br bond lengths in CH3Br, CH2Br2,
HCCBr, and BrCN. Linear regression of the calculated versus
equilibrium bond lengths yields the following relationship, by which
the C-Br was corrected: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r = 0.9946 × ropt + 0.0001, RSD = 0.0015 Å. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The optimized C-Br bond length is 1.9558 Å which, after correction is 1.9453 Å. |
|
|
C-O-H geometry and all interatomic
angles are those given by (1) MP2/6-311+G(d,p) optimization and (2)
MP2/6-311+G(2d,p) optimization. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 4. Heavy atom and C-O-H structure parameters (Å and degrees). Complete structures are given here in Z-matrix format. |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) MP2/6-311+G(d,p) |
|
(2) MP2/6-311+G(2d,p) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ropt (1) |
ropt (2) |
|
|
|
CBr |
1.9453 |
1.9453 |
CC |
1.5102 |
1.5102 |
CO |
1.4141 |
1.4169 |
OH(5) |
0.9634 |
0.9674 |
BrCC |
110.74 |
110.68 |
CCO |
112.74 |
112.88 |
COH |
106.66 |
107.38 |
|
Br - - - H(5) |
2.7396 |
2.7634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 5. 2-Bromoethanol - 79Br. Atomic coordinates, ropt. MP2/6-311+G(2d,p) COH and angles. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a (Å) |
|
b (Å) |
|
c (Å) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Br |
- |
0.9218 |
- |
0.1045 |
|
0.0208 |
|
C |
|
0.6275 |
|
1.0284 |
- |
0.2958 |
|
C |
|
1.8547 |
|
0.4518 |
|
0.3692 |
|
O |
|
2.2431 |
- |
0.7960 |
- |
0.1785 |
|
H |
|
1.5113 |
- |
1.4132 |
- |
0.0391 |
|
H |
|
1.6971 |
|
0.3835 |
|
1.4501 |
|
H |
|
2.6900 |
|
1.1316 |
|
0.1875 |
|
H |
|
0.7510 |
|
1.0808 |
- |
1.3743 |
|
H |
|
0.3800 |
|
2.0083 |
|
0.1063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 6. 2-Bromoethanol - 79Br. Rotational constants (MHz). (1) MP2/6-311+G(d,p) and (2) MP2/6-311+G(2d,p) COH and angles. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ropt (1) |
ropt (2) |
Expt. [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A |
12 047.5 |
11 995.8 |
11 876.226 ± 0.1 |
|
B |
2 360.5 |
2 360.9 |
2 363.755 ± 0.1 |
|
C |
2 093.3 |
2 091.9 |
2 089.978 ± 0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] R.G.Azrak and E.B.Wilson, J.Chem.Phys. 52,5299(1970) |
|
|
[2] J.Demaison, J.Cosléou, R.Bocquet,
and A.G.Lesarri, J.Mol.Spectrosc. 167,400(1994). |
|
|
[3] J.Demaison and G.Wlodarczak, Structural
Chem. 5,57(1994).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2-Chloroethanol |
Methyl Bromide |
|
|
|
|
Ethyl Bromide |
1-Bromo-1-Fluoroethane |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table of Contents |
|
|
|
|
|
Molecules/Bromine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BrH2CCH2OH.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last
Modified 8 March 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|