|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH2BrF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bromine |
|
|
|
Nuclear
Quadrupole Coupling Constants |
|
|
|
in
Bromofluoromethane |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of the bromine nqcc's in
bromofluoromethane was made on best estimate re structures
derived ab initio by Cazzoli
et al. [1], and by Puzzarini et al. [2]. Calculated and
experimental [2 - 4] nqcc's are compared in Tables 1 - 8.
Structure parameters are given in Table 9. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison of these calculated nqcc's
with the experimental results of Cazzoli et al. (2008) [5] is made here. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Tables 1 - 8, subscripts
a,b,c refer to the principal axes of the inertia tensor; subscripts
x,y,z to the principal axes of the nqcc tensor.
The nqcc y-axis is chosen coincident with the c-axis. Ø
(degrees) is the angle between its subscripted parameters. ETA = (Xxx - Xyy)/Xzz. |
|
|
RMS is the root
mean square
difference between calculated and experimental diagonal nqcc
(percentage of average of absolute experimental nqcc's).
RSD
is the residual standard deviation of calibration of the
B1LYP/TZV(3df,3p) model for calculation of the nqcc's, which may be
taken as estimate of the uncertainty in the calculated nqcc's. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 1. 79Br nqcc's in CH2BrF
(MHz). Calculation was made on the re structure of
Cazzoli et al. [1], and on the re structure of Puzzarini et
al. [2]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calc. [1]
|
|
Calc. [2] |
|
Expt. [3] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xaa |
|
444.32 |
|
443.17 |
|
443.531(24) |
|
|
Xbb |
- |
146.35 |
- |
145.75 |
- |
144.980(34) |
|
|
Xcc |
- |
297.97 |
- |
297.42 |
- |
298.551(34) |
|
|
|Xab| |
|
276.67 |
|
276.39 |
|
278.63(54) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMS |
|
0.97 (0.33 %) |
|
0.82 (0.28 %) |
|
|
|
|
RSD |
|
1.58 (0.39 %) |
|
1.58 (0.39 %) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xxx |
- |
255.70 |
- |
255.14 |
- |
255.97(38) |
|
|
Xyy |
- |
297.97 |
- |
297.42 |
- |
298.551(34) |
|
|
Xzz |
|
553.67 |
|
552.56 |
|
554.52(38) |
|
|
ETA |
|
0.0763 |
|
0.0765 |
|
0.07679(17) |
|
|
Øz,a |
|
21.56 |
|
21.59 |
|
21.7188(49) |
|
|
Øa,CBr |
|
21.13 |
|
21.13 |
|
|
|
|
Øz,CBr |
|
0.44 |
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2. 81Br nqcc's in CH2BrF
(MHz). Calculation was made on the re structure of
Cazzoli et al. [1], and on the re structure of Puzzarini et
al. [2]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calc. [1]
|
|
Calc. [2] |
|
Expt. [4] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xaa |
|
371.43 |
|
370.47 |
|
370.724(28) |
|
|
Xbb |
- |
122.48 |
- |
121.99 |
- |
121.319(39) |
|
|
Xcc |
- |
248.94 |
- |
248.49 |
- |
249.405(39) |
|
|
|Xab| |
|
230.92 |
|
230.68 |
|
232.44(13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMS |
|
0.83 (0.34 %) |
|
0.67 (0.27 %) |
|
|
|
|
RSD |
|
1.38 (0.40 %) |
|
1.38 (0.40 %) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xxx |
- |
213.63 |
- |
213.16 |
- |
213.757(91) |
|
|
Xyy |
- |
248.94 |
- |
248.49 |
- |
249.405(39) |
|
|
Xzz |
|
462.58 |
|
461.65 |
|
463.162(91) |
|
|
ETA |
|
0.0763 |
|
0.0765 |
|
0.07697(13) |
|
|
Øz,a |
|
21.54 |
|
21.57 |
|
21.6870(12) |
|
|
Øa,CBr |
|
21.10 |
|
21.11 |
|
|
|
|
Øz,CBr |
|
0.44 |
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 3. 79Br nqcc's
in CDHBrF (MHz). Calculation was made on the re
structure of Cazzoli et al. [1], and on the re structure of
Puzzarini et al. [2]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calc. [1]
|
|
Calc. [2] |
|
Expt. [2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xaa |
|
451.19 |
|
450.03 |
|
450.327(43) |
|
|
Xbb - Xcc |
|
140.24 |
|
140.29 |
|
141.72(11) |
|
|
Xbb |
- |
155.48 |
- |
154.87 |
- |
154.30 * |
|
|
Xcc |
- |
295.71 |
- |
295.16 |
- |
296.02 * |
|
|
|Xab| ** |
|
266.79 |
|
266.53 |
|
269.12(50) |
|
|
|Xac| |
|
35.60 |
|
35.58 |
|
|
|
|
|Xbc| |
|
17.86 |
|
17.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMS |
|
0.86 (0.29 %) |
|
0.62 (0.21 %) |
|
|
|
|
RSD |
|
1.58 (0.39 %) |
|
1.58 (0.39 %) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Derived here from the experimental Xaa and
Xbb - Xcc. |
|
|
** The product XaaXbbXcc
is positive. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 4. 81Br nqcc's
in CDHBrF (MHz). Calculation was made on the re
structure of Cazzoli et al. [1], and on the re structure of
Puzzarini et al. [2]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calc. [1]
|
|
Calc. [2] |
|
Expt. [2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xaa |
|
377.18 |
|
376.21 |
|
376.327(22) |
|
|
Xbb - Xcc |
|
116.94 |
|
116.99 |
|
118.284(32) |
|
|
Xbb |
- |
130.12 |
- |
129.61 |
- |
129.022 * |
|
|
Xcc |
- |
247.06 |
- |
246.60 |
- |
247.306 * |
|
|
|Xab| ** |
|
222.65 |
|
222.43 |
|
224.68(33) |
|
|
|Xac| |
|
29.73 |
|
29.71 |
|
|
|
|
|Xbc| |
|
14.90 |
|
14.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMS |
|
0.81 (0.32 %) |
|
0.54 (0.21 %) |
|
|
|
|
RSD |
|
1.38 (0.40 %) |
|
1.38 (0.40 %) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Derived here from the experimental Xaa and
Xbb - Xcc. |
|
|
** The product XaaXbbXcc
is positive. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 5. 79Br nqcc's in CD2BrF
(MHz). Calculation was made on the re structure of
Cazzoli et al. [1], and on the re structure of Puzzarini et
al. [2]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calc. [1]
|
|
Calc. [2] |
|
Expt. [2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xaa |
|
457.77 |
|
456.61 |
|
456.588(54) |
|
|
Xbb - Xcc |
|
138.17 |
|
138.24 |
|
138.98(14) |
|
|
Xbb |
- |
159.80 |
- |
159.18 |
|
158.80 * |
|
|
Xcc |
- |
297.97 |
- |
297.42 |
|
297.78 * |
|
|
|Xab| |
|
261.58 |
|
261.34 |
|
262.24(24) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMS |
|
0.90 (0.30 %) |
|
0.30 (0.10 %) |
|
|
|
|
RSD |
|
1.58 (0.39 %) |
|
1.58 (0.39 %) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Derived here from the experimental Xaa and
Xbb - Xcc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 6. 81Br nqcc's in CD2BrF
(MHz). Calculation was made on the re structure of
Cazzoli et al. [1], and on the re structure of Puzzarini et
al. [2]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calc. [1]
|
|
Calc. [2] |
|
Expt. [2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xaa |
|
382.68 |
|
381.71 |
|
381.586(51) |
|
|
Xbb - Xcc |
|
115.21 |
|
115.26 |
|
116.312(56) |
|
|
Xbb |
- |
133.74 |
- |
133.22 |
- |
132.637 * |
|
|
Xcc |
- |
248.94 |
- |
248.49 |
- |
248.949 * |
|
|
|Xab| |
|
218.27 |
|
218.07 |
|
218.53(41) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMS |
|
0.90 (0.35 %) |
|
0.44 (0.17 %) |
|
|
|
|
RSD |
|
1.38 (0.40 %) |
|
1.38 (0.40 %) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Derived here from the experimental Xaa and
Xbb - Xcc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 7. 79Br nqcc's in 13CH2BrF
(MHz). Calculation was made on the re structure of
Cazzoli et al. [1], and on the re structure of Puzzarini et
al. [2]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calc. [1]
|
|
Calc. [2] |
|
Expt. [2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xaa |
|
447.58 |
|
446.44 |
|
446.77(7) |
|
|
Xbb - Xcc |
|
148.35 |
|
148.40 |
|
150.52(18) |
|
|
Xbb |
- |
149.62 |
- |
149.02 |
- |
148.12 * |
|
|
Xcc |
- |
297.97 |
- |
297.42 |
- |
298.64 * |
|
|
|Xab| |
|
273.14 |
|
272.86 |
|
277.2(11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMS |
|
1.06 (0.35 %) |
|
0.89 (0.30 %) |
|
|
|
|
RSD |
|
1.58 (0.39 %) |
|
1.58 (0.39 %) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Derived here from the experimental Xaa and
Xbb - Xcc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 8. 81Br nqcc's in 13CH2BrF
(MHz). Calculation was made on the re structure of
Cazzoli et al. [1], and on the re structure of Puzzarini et
al. [2]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calc. [1]
|
|
Calc. [2] |
|
Expt. [2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xaa |
|
374.17 |
|
373.21 |
|
373.44(9) |
|
|
Xbb - Xcc |
|
123.72 |
|
123.76 |
|
125.18(22) |
|
|
Xbb |
|
125.22 |
- |
124.72 |
- |
124.13 * |
|
|
Xcc |
|
248.94 |
- |
248.49 |
- |
249.31 * |
|
|
|Xab| |
|
227.96 |
|
227.73 |
|
230.1(10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMS |
|
0.77 (0.32 %) |
|
0.60 (0.24 %) |
|
|
|
|
RSD |
|
1.38 (0.40 %) |
|
1.38 (0.40 %) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Derived here from the experimental Xaa and
Xbb - Xcc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 9.
Bromofluoromethane. Structure parameters, best estimate re
[1,2] (Å and degrees). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
re [1] |
re [2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CF |
1.3592 |
1.3578 |
|
|
|
CBr |
1.9275 |
1.9256 |
|
|
|
CH |
1.0840 |
1.0833 |
|
|
|
FCBr |
110.17 |
110.14 |
|
|
|
HCF |
109.48 |
109.51 |
|
|
|
HCBr |
107.32 |
107.27 |
|
|
|
HCH |
113.03 |
113.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] G.Cazzoli, C.Puzzarini,
A.Baldacci, and A.Baldan, J.Mol.Spectrosc. 241,112(2007). |
|
|
[2] C.Puzzarini, G.Cazzoli,
A.Baldacci, A.Baldan, C.Michauk, and J.Gauss, J.Chem.Phys.
127,164302(2007). |
|
|
[3] A.Baldacci, P.Stoppa,
A.Pietropolli Charmet, S.Giorgianni, G.Cazzoli, C.Puzzarini,
and R. Wugt Larson, J.Phys.Chem. A, 111,7090(2007). |
|
|
[4] A.Baldacci, P.Stoppa,
A.Pietropolli Charmet, S.Giorgianni, G.Cazzoli, L.Cludi, C.Puzzarini,
and R. Wugt Larson, J.Mol.Spectrosc. 246,126(2007). |
|
|
[5] G.Cazzoli, C.Puzzarini,
S.Stopkowicz, and J.Gauss, Mol.Phys. 106,1181(2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BrClCF2 |
CH3Cl |
CH3Br |
CF2Cl2 |
|
|
BrClCH2 |
CF3Cl |
CF3Br |
CH2Cl2 |
|
|
CH2FCl |
CHF2Cl |
CH2Br2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table of Contents |
|
|
|
|
|
Molecules/Bromine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBrFH2.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last Modified 14 Nov 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|