|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F2C=CCl2 |
|
|
PDF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chlorine |
|
|
|
Nuclear
Quadrupole Coupling Constants |
|
|
in 1,1-Dichloro-2,2-difluoroethylene
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of the chlorine nqcc's in 1,1-dichloro-2,2-difluoroethylene was made
on a structure derived ab initio,
as described below. These nqcc's are given in Table 1. Structure
parameters are given in Table 2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Table 1, RSD is the
calibration residual standard deviation for the B1LYP/TZV(3df,2p) model
for calculation of the chlorine nqcc's. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscripts a,b,c refer to the
principal axes of the inertia tensor; x,y,z to the principal axes
of the nqcc tensor. The nqcc y-axis is chosen coincident with the
inertia c-axis, these are perpendicular to the molecular symmetry plane.
Ø (degrees) is the angle between its subscripted
parameters. ETA = (Xxx - Xyy)/Xzz. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 1. Chlorine
nqcc's in F2C=CCl2 (MHz). Calculation was made on the ab initio ropt structure. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calc. |
|
Expt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35Cl |
Xaa |
|
9.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
Xbb |
- |
47.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
Xcc |
|
38.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|Xab| |
|
53.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSD |
|
0.49 (1.1 %) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xxx |
|
41.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
Xyy |
|
38.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
Xzz |
- |
79.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
ETA |
- |
0.034 |
|
|
|
|
|
Øz,a |
|
58.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
Øa,CCl |
|
59.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
Øz,CCl |
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37Cl |
Xaa |
|
7.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Xbb |
- |
37.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
Xcc |
|
30.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|Xab| |
|
41.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSD |
|
0.44 (1.1 %) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The angle between the two z-axes is 0.62o smaller than
the ClCCl angle. This is atypical of the XCl2 dichloride
moiety. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ab Initio Molecular Structure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The molecular structure was optimized
at the MP2/6-311+G(d,p) level of theory assuming Cs symmetry.
The optimized C=C bond length was then corrected using the equation
obtained from linear regression analysis of the data given in Table
IX of Ref. [3]. Likewise, the optimized CF bond lengths were corrected
by regression analysis of the data given in Table VI of Ref. [2]. For
the CCl bond, the structure was optimized at the MP2/6-311+G(2d,p)
level and corrected by linear regression analysis of the data given
in Table 4 of Ref. [1]. Interatomic angles are those given by MP2/6-311+G(2d,p)
optimization. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2. Molecular structure parameters, ropt (Å and degrees). |
|
|
|
|
CCl |
1.7027 |
|
CF |
1.3087 |
|
C=C |
1.3289 |
|
CCCl |
120.73 |
|
CCF |
124.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] I.Merke, L.Poteau, G.Wlodarczak, A.Bouddou,
and J.Demaison, J.Mol.Spectrosc. 177,232(1996). |
|
|
[2] R.M.Villamañan, W.D.Chen, G.Wlodarczak,
J.Demaison, A.G.Lesarri, J.C.López, and J.L.Alonso, J.Mol.Spectrosc.
171,223(1995). |
|
|
[3] J.Demaison, J.Cosléou, R.Bocquet,
and A.G.Lesarri, J.Mol.Spectrosc. 167,400(1994). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H2C=CHCl |
c-FHC=CHCl |
H2C=CCl2 |
ClHC=CCl2 |
|
|
H2C=CFCl |
t-FHC=CHCl |
F2C=CFCl |
c-ClHC=CHCl |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table of Contents |
|
|
|
|
|
Molecules/Chlorine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CF2CCl2.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last
Modified 14 Feb 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|