|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ClF2C-CH2F |
|
|
PDF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chlorine |
|
|
|
Nuclear
Quadrupole Coupling Constants |
|
|
in
trans-1-Chloro-1,1,2-Trifluoroethane
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of the chlorine nqcc's in
trans-1-chloro-1,1,2-trifluoroethane
was made on structures with bond lengths derived ab initio
by the methods of the Lille group, as described below.
Interatomic angles used are those given by (1) MP2/6-311+G(d,p),
and (2) B3P86/6-311+G(3d,3p) optimization. Calculated nqcc's are
compared with the experimental nqcc's of Liu et al. [1] in Tables 1 and
2. Structure
parameters are given in Z-Matrix format in Table 3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The results
of calculations made on MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ approximate equilibrium
structures of both trans and gauche conformers are given on this
page. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Tables 1 and 2, RMS is the root
mean square difference between calculated and experimental diagonal
nqcc's (percentage of the average of the magnitudes of the experimental
nqcc's). RSD is the calibration residual standard deviation for
the B1LYP/TZV(3df,2p) model for calculation of the chlorine
nqcc's. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscripts a,b,c refer to the
principal axes of the inertia tensor; x,y,z to the principal axes
of the nqcc tensor. The nqcc y-axis is chosen coincident with the
inertia c-axis, these are perpendicular to the molecular symmetry
plane.
Ø (degrees) is the angle between its subscripted
parameters. ETA = (Xxx - Xyy)/Xzz. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 1. 35Cl
nqcc's in ClF2C-CH2F (MHz). Calculation was
made on the ab initio
structure with interatomic angles given by (1) MP2/6-311+G(d,p),
and (2) B3P86/6-311+G(3d,3p) optimization. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calc. (1)
|
|
Calc. (2) |
|
Expt. [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xaa |
- |
58.47 |
- |
57.94 |
- |
57.958(10) |
|
|
Xbb |
|
21.60 |
|
21.13 |
|
21.231(11) |
|
|
Xcc |
|
36.87 |
|
36.82 |
|
36.727(11) |
|
|
|Xab| |
|
36.05 |
|
36.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMS |
|
0.37 (1.0 %) |
0.08 (0.2 %) |
|
|
|
|
RSD |
|
0.49 (1.1 %) |
|
0.49 (1.1 %) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xxx |
|
35.44 |
|
35.31 |
|
35.40 * |
|
|
Xyy |
|
36.87 |
|
36.82 |
|
36.727 |
|
|
Xzz |
- |
72.31 |
- |
72.13 |
- |
72.13 |
|
|
ETA |
|
0.020 |
|
0.021 |
|
0.018 |
|
|
Øz,a |
|
21.00 |
|
21.30 |
|
21.28 |
|
|
Øa,CCl |
|
21.67 |
|
22.12 |
|
22.12 |
|
|
Øz,CCl |
|
0.67 |
|
0.81 |
|
0.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Calculated here from the
experimental diagonal nqcc's and |Xab| = 36.37 MHz.
Calc. (2). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2. 37Cl
nqcc's in ClF2C-CH2F (MHz). Calculation was
made on the ab initio
structure with interatomic angles given by (1) MP2/6-311+G(d,p),
and (2) B3P86/6-311+G(3d,3p) optimization. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calc. (1)
|
|
Calc. (2) |
|
Expt. [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xaa |
- |
46.66 |
- |
46.27 |
- |
46.268(11) |
|
|
Xbb |
|
17.60 |
|
17.25 |
|
17.319(13) |
|
|
Xcc |
|
29.06 |
|
29.02 |
|
28.949(13) |
|
|
|Xab| |
|
27.76 |
|
28.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMS |
|
0.29 (0.9 %) |
0.05 (0.2 %) |
|
|
|
|
RSD |
|
0.44 (1.1 %) |
|
0.44 (1.1 %) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Molecular
Structure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The molecular structure was optimized
at the MP2/6-311+G(d,p) level of theory assuming Cs
symmetry. The optimized CC single bond length was then corrected
using the equation obtained from linear regression analysis of the data
given in
Table IX of Ref.[4]. Likewise, the optimized CF bond lengths were
corrected by regression analysis of the data given in Table VI of
Ref.[3].
For the CCl bond, the structure was optimized at the
MP2/6-311+G(2d,p)
level and corrected by linear regression analysis of the data given in
Table
4 of Ref.[2]. The CH bond lengths were corrected using r = 1.001
ropt, where ropt is obtained by MP2/6-31G(d,p)
optimization
[5]. Interatomic angles used in the calculation are those given
by
(1) MP2/6-311+G(d,p) and (2) B3P86/6-311+G(3d,3p) optimization. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 3. Structure parameters
(Å and degrees). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cl |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C |
1 |
R1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
C |
2 |
R2 |
1 |
A1 |
|
|
|
|
H |
3 |
R3 |
2 |
A3 |
1 |
D3 |
|
|
H |
3 |
R3 |
2 |
A3 |
1 |
- D3 |
|
|
F |
3 |
R4 |
2 |
A4 |
1 |
180. |
|
|
F |
2 |
R5 |
3 |
A5 |
6 |
D5 |
|
|
F |
2 |
R5 |
3 |
A5 |
6 |
- D5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MP2 Angles |
B3P86 Angles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R1 |
1.7624 |
|
|
|
|
|
R2 |
1.5085 |
|
|
|
|
|
R3 |
1.089 |
|
|
|
|
|
R4 |
1.368 |
|
|
|
|
|
R5 |
1.338 |
|
|
|
|
|
A1 |
109.30 |
108.96 |
|
|
|
|
A3 |
109.10 |
109.10 |
|
|
|
|
A4 |
108.98 |
109.23 |
|
|
|
|
A5 |
110.71 |
111.20 |
|
|
|
|
D3 |
60.65 |
60.50 |
|
|
|
|
D5 |
59.47 |
59.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] B.Liu, Y.Tatamitani,
J.Shimada, and T.Ogata, J.Mol.Spectrosc. 211,99(2002). |
|
|
[2] I.Merke, L.Poteau,
G.Wlodarczak, A.Bouddou, and J.Demaison, J.Mol.Spectrosc. 177,232(1996). |
|
|
[3] R.M.Villamañan, W.D.Chen,
G.Wlodarczak, J.Demaison, A.G.Lesarri, J.C.López, and
J.L.Alonso, J.Mol.Spectrosc. 171,223(1995) |
|
|
[4] J.Demaison,
J.Cosléou, R.Bocquet, and A.G.Lesarri, J.Mol.Spectrosc.
167,400(1994). |
|
|
[5] J.Demaison and G.Wlodarczak,
Structural Chem. 5,57(1994). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH3Cl |
CH3CH2Cl |
CH2ClCHF2 |
CH3CCl3 |
|
|
CF2ClCH3 |
CH2ClCH2F |
CF2ClCHF2 |
CF2ClCF3 |
|
|
CF3Cl |
CH2ClCF3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table of Contents |
|
|
|
|
|
Molecules/Chlorine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CF2ClCH2F.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last
Modified 14 Aug 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|